TWA

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Kindle Cover Disasters, showcasing the worst in Kindle cover art (there are some howlers here)

In Uncategorized on March 16, 2015 at 9:41 pm

 “For anyone who assumes these are all self-pub…there’s a fair number from small presses, too.”

– Victoria Strauss

k7 k6 k5 k4 k3 k2 k1

REFERENCES

@victoriastrauss

Proof that Absoute Write, Writer Beware & the SFWA are Diminished

In Uncategorized on September 1, 2014 at 7:26 pm

Proof that Absoute Write, Writer Beware & the SFWA are Diminished

The Post That Victoria Strauss Will REGRET Posting: Can You Say Faux Pas? Victoria Strauss, Writer Beware, SFWA, & AW Are Erroding

In Uncategorized on September 1, 2014 at 6:14 pm

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.

– Mahatma Gandhi

“The Absolute Write Water Cooler is active enough, but has more than their fair
share of condescending know-it-alls. If you’ve ever been there for any length of
time, it’s like being back in high school. I didn’t like high school the first time
around.”

The Post That Victoria Strauss Will REGRET Posting: Can You Say Faux Pas?

 

“I’ve certainly encountered some jerks on the AW boards.”

Jim Heskett

“I’m not an AW user. Tried it. Found too many people lacked ‘tact’ filters”

ikmar

” . . .  I left AW anyway due to counter-productive moderation. The forums, while popular, are about 10 years behind the socialization curve.”

Anthony

“I’ve visited the site a few times. Always found the conversation something I wouldn’t want to participate in.”

– Anne

“I have responded to your posting, to clarify some matters.

cturkel

“Victoria, As you know, in 2011 or 2012, i was harassed by this site so much so that I considered filing charges. . . . . I also thought of crafting an ebook on ALL the HATE I received from this site-one of its members went after my subscribers trying to spread their venom-one of my ‘subscribers’ let them into her site-another, thank goodness, flipped the email to me so then I went after this hateful troll using some legalese that stopped her from continued harassment. I contacted the owner of Absolute Write who was a royal you-know-what. Frankly, I think the only person this site is OK to is you, Victoria. I’ve heard MANY complaints about this bullying site that has so called writers on it who are posting in the 5-digit thousands! Who has time to post 10,000+ comments?? -I’ll tell you who has time, TROLLERS & HATERS. I personally don’t think association with this site serves anyone. Now watch, they’ll come after me again. If they do I have many pages of their VERBATIM comments made to me from that site-I copied & saved. There still may be an ebook from this. I’ve always wondered why Writer Beware supports this site.”

– Marla Miller

“I used to post on the AW forums . . . .  I made the mistake of asking a question about something that didn’t follow AW’s received wisdom. The response my query generated – from other users including mods really put me off the forums. I’m sure I would fill one of those bingo cards some of the mods joke about . . . . I no longer post, the whole thing just made me feel unwelcome. I guess I have a really thin skin. But life is too short, I wouldn’t waste my time with a campaign like this. I still think . . .  some of the users and mods leave something to be desired.”

– Anonymous

“Just some questions, Victoria, that I consider fair ones based on your commentary here:

1. You say we should trust that you know the truth about the real person, the single source behind all the blogs critical of AW. Isn’t that like saying we must trust you to be infallible? Why not place the evidence, all of it, here on your blog and let the public investigate and decide the truth or falsity of your allegation? I’m sorry, but the last time I heard “trust me” it was from President Obama and I voted for him. Nothing personal.

2. You used the term “Bully Central”and overlooking the grand amount of criticism of Absolute Write out there, I see no one else using that term. They merely state or infer that bullying exists on AW and they provide examples in terms of excerpts and links. But in truth we all know that bullying can be difficult to define and therefore quantify. A person can feel bullied, whereas as an outside observer such as yourself might term the person a victim of firm moderation. No one has quantified the precise amount of bullying that hypothetically might take place at AW, but for the record and the sake of clarification, are you saying that no bullying has ever taken place at AW? Or are you saying that you have witnessed no single act of bullying by moderators and/or members, and therefore, you have no direct knowledge of such instances?

3. Since semantics might be an issue in all the confusion, how would you personally define an act of cyberbullying? What is your criteria?

– Lesley Cameron

“No one has to ‘trust [me] to be infallible.’ I’m not the Pope. But I am trustworthy. Either you accept that or you don’t. And as I’ve noted, I received information in confidence, and, like all information shared with Writer Beware, I will keep it in confidence. I’ve also done my own research. We know you are not the Pope. But doesn’t this response encourage more suspicion than it does trust? The issue isn’t whether I or anyone else should or should not trust you, the issue is whether or not your allegation has substance to it. You could, for example, be trustworthy by some measure and a total imbecile by another. I might trust you to buy me gum for a quarter and not trust you to drive my new Mercedes to the drugstore. No one should take an allegation like this at face value without evidence. Asking people to believe you regardless of anything to the contrary is like asking us to have faith in your personal God. Let me turn the question around …This is a predictable response. It appears you don’t have much of a choice but to dodge the questions by responding with other questions. By the way, Victoria, why would you term the number of complaints small unless you had a measure to compare, unless you knew for a fact that the number of complaints about AW could actually be much larger? Doesn’t this point to you perhaps knowing about the bullying but refusing to admit it? But it’s all relative, isn’t it? Two or three complaints of vicious bullying on the part of Absolute Write mods and owners is too much in my view. And we all know, for every voiced complaint there are ten to twenty people who just keep quiet and go on their way. We can all see, the number of complaints is large, and growing. And as for ref the same sources, the source referenced is Absolute Write, and yes, it’s the same source. All links or examples of cruel bullying and arrogance I’ve witnessed are connected to AW. And I disagree, Anonymous comments do count. They don’t count for you, and that is predictable also, but you should not to dictate whether or not they count for anyone else. Putting on a fraudulent front like AW owner Melodi Sherman did is no different than signing off as Anonymous. The end result is the same: the real identity is hidden.AW is filled with creature and stock book cover disguises of various kinds. Are you saying their opinions or comments don’t count either, e.g., Old Hack? If I sign off, Old Hack, or Old Cat, or Hack Cat, or whatever, does that make my comment on anything any more or less valid than if I signed off as Anonymous? 
But what is more important, Victoria, is the substance of the message, the reality it brings to the growing conflict that will continue to grow and grow. And if you regard findings and observations of bullying by AW mods and owners as noted on W.A.R. or anywhere else to be acts of cyberbullying, well then, you’ve issued forth your definition of cyberbullying. I have not witnessed any act of cyberbullying in these places, but since you might know better, you can link to one for our benefit? You could link to it, yes, and also to an act of cyberbullying on AW, a classic one, and then we could compare the two. That would be an interesting exercise. Why don’t you do that? Ce sont les tonneaux vides qui font le plus de bruit, Victoria.”

– Lesley Cameron

“I find it troublesome that you’re framing anyone who has had legitimate issues with the site as being part of a ‘smear campaign.’ That language in and of itself outs you, and perhaps the site as being unable to accept criticism and countering viewpoints which is the main issue that many people find with Absolute Write.

Particularly when it comes to the issue of self publishing AW seems rather militant in what they view as the ‘right’ way to publish and can be almost terrifying to those who dare go against the Canonical Wisdom of Absolute Write. I’ve seen a lot of terrible things go down on that site and I think it’s disingenuous to dismiss these concerns as ‘smear campaign’ and ‘bullying.’ You’re dismissing legitimate concerns and real issues that you and your site should be focusing on fixing, but it seems that the site is rather stuck in its ways (has been since 2009) and isn’t willing to really accept any kind of changes from people a little more up to date with the contemporary publishing milieu.”

– Anonymous

“I am a 75 year old retired professor who is just as “trustworthy” as anyone else. I do not lie, cheat, or use profane language. And yet, I have been banned forever from Absolute Write. So far as I can tell, the reason for my banishment was that I chose to disagree with some of the regulars on the forum who, by the way, were quite disrespectful and profane in their responses to me. I am doing quite nicely post banishment, secure in my belief that a writing site isn’t worth much when debate is closed without giving participants a chance at rebuttal.”

– Anonymous

 

REFERENCES

 

http://accrispin.blogspot.com/2014/08/haters-gonna-hate-smear-campaign.html

#victoriastrauss

Abuse Contacts at Absolute Write’s Hoster

In Uncategorized on July 29, 2014 at 9:40 pm

Abuse Contacts at Absolute Write’s Hoster

The SFWA’s Michael Capobianco Tried to Hide Public Information Before: Deleting Members Should Be No Suprise

In Uncategorized on June 27, 2014 at 12:41 am

“Just for the record, niether SFWA nor Writer Beware are represented by Charles E. Petit.”

  • Sure, not now (because he’s disbarred). Be truthful Michael Capobianco (Former President of the SFWA and Husband to Ann “A.C.” Crispin; the other BIG half of Writer Beware) didn’t he? Charles E. Petit, did accept service for all of your peeps in the Bauer vs. Glatzer case. Truth Michael . . . it’s all on the line. And, by the way, “neither” is spelled n-e-i-t-h-e-r not “niether.” Admit your affiliation to Charles Emil Petit….just for the record.

Charles E. Petit is also believed to be an Absolute Write Moderator and frequent contributor and commenter on Writer Beware ™. Confidential sources indicated to The Write Agenda that, at one time, all complaints and “cease & desist” letters regardingWriter Beware™ were to be directed to Charles E. Petit. On information and belief, it appears that he did accept service of process for several defendants in the Bauer vs. Glatzer in 2007. This may have also included Jenna Glatzer and Miss Snark.  Petit never actually represented any of the defendants. He couldn’t because he’s not licensed in New Jersey. He did accept service and then referred the case to local New Jersey attorneys. He was subjected to disciplinary action, by the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, after a complaint was filed by Nancy Steinbeck who was the former wife of John Steinbeck IV, the son of author John Steinbeck (see below). SFWA Caught Manipulating Facts & Deleting SFWA Member Directory After 7:00 AM EST isn’t anything new.

REFERENCE

https://thewriteagenda.wordpress.com/2014/04/16/victoria-struass-moment-of-fame-on-the-christian-science-monitor/

Weinerdog’s Defense of Lee Goldberg & Self-Promotion (@leegoldberg)

In Uncategorized on May 21, 2014 at 4:58 pm

“In every war there are the front line troops, and the puppet masters behind the scenes, who profit both from the war and from its outcome.”

 

The Lake Geneva News recently posted their rationale for writing a story about James Strauss. The story was brought to their attention by Author, Lee Goldberg. The posting is available here.

This story, which Lee Goldberg started as an innocent little scam busting venture, is far from being over. The Lake Geneva area has a long history of political conflict.  There is every reason to continue to question the relationship between Lee Goldberg, John Halverson, The Lake Geneva News and the connections to puppet masters behind the scenes. Maybe, if the opportunity presents itself, we can use Lee Goldberg’s strategy . . . name the “players” at another time. Just like Lee Goldberg . . .  everything is in the timing.

Our original inquiry regarding Lee Goldberg was not raised to support James Strauss. It was raised to question Lee Goldberg’s motives as to why he was bringing information, posted over a year ago, back into the picture and naming names now. In response, Lee Goldberg used the weinerdog strategies: “confuse the reader, get off topic, attack commentators, shield, deflect and exit without answering questions  . . .  while leaving behind more questions in the mind of the reader.” Lee Goldberg and his followers made a mockery of our reasonable inquiry. In addition, Lee Goldberg enlisted the help of Author, Libby Hellmann, prior to getting their facts correct, thereby raising more questions about his motives and credibility. Many, including John Halverson, General Manager and Editor, have claimed that our posts (linking Lee Goldberg to meals and as a passenger in James Strauss’ car) are irrelevant. Normally, that would be true. However, Lee Goldberg denied accepting a ride from James Strauss and denied accepting a paid meal from James Strauss. The Write Agenda has received information that would call into question Lee Goldberg’s truthfulness. Therefore, it is Lee Goldberg that “exposed” himself and became a credibility issue and that is why it is relevant.

We responded to the posting only to be taunted by Ben Reeder (We’re not going to dignify Ben by calling him an author. He’s not. But, he thinks he is.) Ben, as usual, likes to jump on high profile stories for self-promotional activities. Normally, we ignore him . . .  as do the book buying community. Ben, apparently since birth, regularly seeks out acceptance.  He’s a strong advocate (devotee’) of Victoria Stauss and habitually coddles the breast of Writer Beware and its flying monkeys as if they were some surrogate mothers. He’s the panty waste that posts things and looks to Victoria Strauss for approval. Nevertheless, we chose to indulge Mr. Reeder on this occasion only because relates to some of strategies of Lee Goldberg, those in the SFWA  and the science fiction community in general. Enjoy.

* * *

Miriam Silverstein:  Come on John! This is the most politically motivated BS. Goldberg is the pawn . . . and you used him. We’d still like to know about your connections to Jody Mikkelsen.

https://thewriteagenda.wordpress.com/2014/05/14/lee-goldberg-issues-top-posts-at-the-write-agenda-leegoldberg/

Ben S Reeder: And once again Bob Fletcher’s sock puppet speaks. Ladies and Gentlemen, meet Miriam Silverstein…er, Robert Fletcher, I mean The Write Agenda. Ms. Silverstein’s account is a sock puppet for The Write Agenda, a smear campaign aimed at one time at any literary watchdog group out there who educated writers about the tactics of vanity presses whose sole purpose was to bilk new authors out of their money without providing a penny of actual service. Now that they’ve been completely ineffective in shutting down Absolute Write and Writer Beware, it appears they’ve turned their attention to a successful writer who outed another of their kind. Note how Ms “Silverstein’s” links ALWAYS go back to the same wordpress site, that of (you guessed it) The Write Agenda. Because if they attack a very public person, they MUST be legit, right? LOL

No, Bob, not really.

And Bob, I know you changed “Miriam’s” profile pic a couple of days ago after it was publicly outed as a stock photo pic, but covering “her” face with badly photoshopped glasses and a scarf is just plain lazy. You might as well put a paper bag over her head and drop the charade that “she” is anything other than you using your 76th (or is it your 77th? I keep forgetting about Nick Caruso) alias. Because now “she” appears to be trying just as hard to hide her face as TWA does, which is probably not the conclusion you want people to draw. She’s supposed to at least LOOK more legit than TWA.

Miriam Silverstein:  Ben, this is neither the place nor the forum for your lame self-promotion activities. This spot belongs to Mr. Goldberg; you cannot possibly think that piggybacking in Goldberg’s world is going to help sell your cold black suet-pudding. We can represent your books as cold suet-roll of fabulously reptilian length. Cut it at any point, it is the same thing; the same heavy, sticky, opaque mass all through and all along. No one buys them. No one wants them. Just like you . . . no one wanted you since birth; pity the people that found you in the pineapple patch.

Your bio also mentions your military service. Was that an honorable discharge? Assuming that you really were in the military and honorably discharged, your post-military service has really been so illustrious: you’ve worked in a video arcade, on a farm, selling ads, a clerk in a convenience store, scanning medical records . . . now you want to be taken serious as an author? Oh yes, let’s not forget that you “trained” to be a massage therapist and have attained a second level in reiki. Trained . . . so, you’re not certified? Not licensed? Now, you’re affiliated with a Traditional Witchcraft publisher? Boo! Seriously? We’re not really sure we would want you rubbing our backs, body parts or your rosy palms for hands-on healing. [NOTE: The State of Missouri, where Ben lives, requires all Massage Therapists to be licensed. A cursory search of the Missouri licensing database does not indicate that Ben has a license to practice massage therapy. “Trained”?]

Ben Reeder is the proverbial man with the crossed arms; distant and very insecure. Ben, your pagan tokhis can pick a fight with us any day (or with Robert Fletcher . . . FYI Fletcher IS NOT associated with The Write Agenda). If you choose to throw your shmutz around . . . do it in the right playground. Now, get on your broom and fly home to your trailer park princess Randi!

Ben S Reeder: Miriam Silverstein You did more to promote me than I ever said about myself, Bob. As to my bio, thank you for your interest, Mr Fletcher. And for showing your true colors. As a supposed “Christian” you openly mock the choice of a good woman by implying adoption is a rejection, once again showing your lack of class. You mocked my service to my country, thus mocking every one of my military brothers and sisters. And trying to insult the woman I love? Wow, grasping at straws much, Bob? I guess you didn’t dig deep enough into my past, or maybe you DID and decided, like you usually do, to only include what served your purposes, leaving out my current project. But just like you do when you post as TWA, you try to deflect the attention away from yourself with an attempt to smear the person shining the light on your shady alter-ego, thus proving that you’re the same person. Just goes to show everyone I’m right, Bob. Way to go!

But hey, Bob, did YOU serve your country? Have you ever had a real job? And yes, you ARE associated with The Write Agenda. The only way to prove that statement wrong is for the Write Agenda to finally man up and take the paper bag off, and for YOU to put a real photo up instead of that photoshopped mess you’re using. Otherwise, you haven’t done a thing to disprove Writer Beware’s evidence showing that you ARE behind the Write Agenda.

I’d say “Nice try” but you’d have to have put together a decent attempt. I can’t even give you a D for effort.

Miriam Silverstein:  Ben, like I said . . . pick another playground. Mr. Strauss is a vet . . . was he mocked?

I really don’t know if “Bob” Fletcher served in the armed forces. We don’t even know if you did. Moreover, if you ever can prove that you did . . . it didn’t “serve” you well. Stay on topic Ben. No division of the armed services would be proud of you now any way. We’d love to see your discharge papers.

Every picture that we’ve seen of “Bob” Fletcher is of “Bob” Fletcher. Also, I am not a “Christian.” I am in fact Jewish as is most of The Write Agenda’s staff. Now Ben, I’d like to help you with that accusation (“Christian”), can you point to a link that ever said that? No, you can’t because it’s not there. Show the proofs Ben!

Now go . . . wave your wand and add the eye of a Newt . . . through your sorcery bring forth the proof of my Christianity!

Miriam Silverstein:  And Ben . . . this is “Bob” Fletcher:

https://twitter.com/Robert_CEO

Ben S Reeder: And so are you. But, on the other hand, Strauss was exposed, not mocked. As to your religious convictions, you associate with Theodore Beale (remember the guy you backed for SFWA presidency?) who has been very vocal in his disdain for Jews. So, are you only Jewish when you’re Miriam? Or is it only when you’re not talking to him?

Either way, you’re a sock puppet for Bob Fletcher. That’s been shown. One of your fake photos has already been exposed, forcing you to change it in a lame attempt to protect the facade, and you try to use the same failed techniques at discrediting those who don’t believe your BS as the Write Agenda does. While you’ve been attempting to smear me, you’ve been showing who you really are to the folks here. That was the whole purpose behind my original comment, and you’ve served my purposes admirably. Thank you, Mr Fletcher for exposing your lack of class and for using the exact same word choices and tactics used by the Write Agenda, thereby cementing the conclusion that you are one and the same.

In other words, this thread has served its purpose, as have you. Thank you for playing. I’ve spent as much time as I choose to on this. But for those of you watching at home, for her next act, “Miriam” here is going to throw more bombast and noisy accusations at me, try to smear either me or Lee Goldberg while asserting that she is still not Bob Fletcher. Because Bob isn’t nearly as smart as he thinks he is. And “she’ll” attempt to hammer the “I’m Jewish, not Christian” thing into the ground, forgetting that TWA has constantly attacked people for their “UnChristian” behaviors while at the same time breaking that whole commandment about bearing false witness.

Done here. Thanks for playing Bob.

Miriam Silverstein:  There you have if folks . . . the typical response from a “weinerdog.” This kind of response is very emblematic in the science fiction writing community. Confuse the reader, get off topic, attack commentators, shield, deflect and exit without answering questions . . . while leaving behind more questions in the mind of the reader. These are the type of people that Lee Goldberg is associated with.

For example: 1) we questioned Ben’s (and only Ben’s) military service. Did he receive an honorable discharge? 2) Ben indicates that he “trained” to be a massage therapist. What exactly does that mean? Does “trained” mean that that he’s certified and licensed? Reasonable questions. We encouraged Ben to pick another venue (not this forum) to carry on this exchange. Since he chose to reply here (again) his content does raise some interesting parallels and how it relates to how we all came here in the first place . . . Lee Goldberg.

How does Ben reply? First, he calls me “Bob” (which is a reference to Robert Fletcher) even though we (The Write Agenda) have repeatedly stated that Mr. Fletcher is not affiliated with The Write Agenda. Lee Goldberg used the same strategy. It doesn’t matter to Ben. He still needs/wants to believe that there is some association. Second, he states that I’ve professed somewhere to be a “Christian.” Third, he states that I’ve mocked the men and women that serve in our armed services.

You see the strategy? “Confuse the reader, get off topic, attack commentators, shield, deflect and exit without answering questions . . . while leaving behind more questions in the mind of the reader.” Ben, completely avoids providing proof of his military service, providing proof of an honorable discharge and providing proof of his certification and licensing documentation regarding his “training” as a massage therapist.

In my reply, Ben was again encouraged to provide the information and stay on topic. In addition, I advised Ben that I am not a “Christian” and requested that he also produce a link or information proves that I’m somehow connected to Christianity (see how they make stuff up?). Ben, was also provided with Mr. Fletcher’s Twitter information and picture to personally contact. We did challenge the infamous Ann “A.C.” Crispin (deceased) on her erroneous use of the word “mitzvah.”

Now, here’s where it starts to get rather pathetic. Ben responds AGAIN claiming that 1) I am “Bob,” 2) James Strauss was “exposed, not mocked,” 3) raised our support of Theodore Beale during his SFWA President campaign, and then 4) raises the question of doubt in his own mind . . . that is, if I’m not “Bob” surely I’m “a sock puppet for ‘Bob’ Fletcher.” Ben, also failed to provide proof of my “Christianity.” Again, “Confuse the reader, get off topic, attack commentators, shield, deflect and exit without answering questions . . . while leaving behind more questions in the mind of the reader.” Ben, completely avoids providing proof of his military service, providing proof of an honorable discharge and providing proof of his certification and licensing documentation regarding his “training” as a massage therapist. Painted into a corner he decides “this thread has served its purpose . . . Thank you for playing. I’ve spent as much time as I choose to on this” . . . and goes home. Playing? Ben, this is not “playing.” Is Lee Goldberg “playing”? No Ben, it’s deeper than that. As is true with many in this science fiction community, Ben demonstrates the tactics and strategies of these types of bullies. They defend each other to the death even when facts and evidence demonstrate otherwise.

Our original inquiry regarding Lee Goldberg was not raised to support James Strauss. It was raised to question Lee Goldberg’s motives as to why he was bringing information, posted over a year ago, back into the picture and naming names now. In response, Lee Goldberg used the same strategies: “confuse the reader, get off topic, attack commentators, shield, deflect and exit without answering questions . . . while leaving behind more questions in the mind of the reader.” In addition, Lee Goldberg enlisted the help of Author, Libby Hellmann, prior to getting their facts correct, thereby raising more questions about his motives and credibility. Many, including John Halverson, General Manager and Editor, have claimed that our posts (linking Lee Goldberg to meals and as a passenger in James Strauss’ car) are irrelevant. Normally, that would be true. However, Lee Goldberg denied accepting a ride from James Strauss and denied accepting a paid meal from James Strauss. The Write Agenda has received information that would call into question Lee Goldberg’s truthfulness. Therefore, it is Lee Goldberg that “exposed” himself and became a credibility issue and that is why it is relevant.

This story, which Lee Goldberg started as an innocent little scam busting venture, is far from being over. The Lake Geneva area has a long history of political conflict. “In every war there are the front line troops, and the puppet masters behind the scenes, who profit both from the war and from its outcome.” There is every reason to continue to question the relationship between Lee Goldberg, John Halverson, The Lake Geneva News and the connections to puppet masters behind the scenes. Maybe, if the opportunity presents itself, we can use Lee Goldberg’s strategy . . . name the “players” at another time.

In the words of Teddy Roosevelt:

“It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the one who is actually in the arena. Whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives voluntarily, who errors and comes short again and again. Who knows the great enthusiasms? The great devotions and spends himself in a worthy cause. Who at best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement? And who at worst at least fails while doing greatly. So that his place shall never be with those cold and tired souls who know neither victory nor defeat.”

The Write Agenda will seek justice and defend the oppressed.

REFERENCES

http://www.lakegenevanews.net/Articles-Commentary-i-2014-05-15-253268.114135-Why-we-wrote-about-James-Strauss.html?fb_comment_id=fbc_1497563033790540_1497865007093676_1497865007093676#f65ba2848

More questions developing on Lee Goldberg’s (@leegoldberg) connections and ties to the local political scene in James Strauss’ neighborhood (Lake Geneva, Wisconsin); Goldberg’s motivations may very well go beyond “exposing a SCAM.” Stay tuned.

FURTHER READING

Lee Goldberg: What is His Motive and Hidden Agenda Behind Exposing James Strauss Now? @leegoldberg
Request for Information: Author & TV Producer, Lee Goldberg @leegoldberg
Who Drove Lee Goldberg to the Airport: Goldberg’s “Truth” Starts to Unravel
UPDATED: Lee Goldberg: What is His Motive and Hidden Agenda Behind Exposing James Strauss Now? @leegoldberg
Lee Goldberg Waffles on His Meals & Ride With Known Scammer James Strauss @Lee Goldberg
Libby Hellmann’s ‏(@libbyhellmann) Statement Now in Question Regarding Lee Goldberg (@leegoldberg)

 

If you value what we do, support us herehere or here. Are the purported “scam busters” what they say they are?

You decide. SUPPORT The Write Agenda.

Let us all strive to extinguish the flames of controversy, end the derision and pursue equity in the resolution of author grievances.

“Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning.”  – Albert Einstein

Snideness Becomes Stacia Kane – Bottom Lister Author Still Hopes for Sales on Absolute Write

In Uncategorized on May 21, 2014 at 12:53 pm

“Stacia is a bully-instigator. She also propagates the bully mentality by validating the bully views, even if she doesn’t have the whole story. I think she does this to try to get more book sales and get more popular with goodreads reviewers. She’s a bit of a snake to put it nicely.”

– STGRB

Blogger examines the possible bullying strategies and techniques of Absolute Write regular, Stacia Kane . Is Stacia Kane guilty of  character assassination? Read the post here.

REFERENCES

http://www.stopthegrbullies.com/badly-behaving-goodreaders/

http://writeabsolutereviews.blogspot.com/2014/05/snideness-becomes-stacia-kane-bottom.html

James D. Macdonald of Absolute Write – Writer or Sort-of-Writer or No Writer At All?

In Uncategorized on May 20, 2014 at 12:10 pm

It should be the responsibility of editors and publishers to recognize real talent and sort it out from wanna-be copy cat writings. Surely there’s better than this out there. It’s a stretch to even give this series one star. I will not feed my children fast food. The only thing that keeps this series from being total junk is that much attention is obviously paid to grammar. Obviously a lot of toil, but common as TP.”

– A. Customer

Amazon book review commenting on James D. Macdonald writing

Blogger questions the authenticity of James D. Macdonald’s authorship. Does James D. Macdonald actually write? Read the post here.

 

 

Is SFWA President Steven Gould Ill? Recent Pictures Illustrate Stress on Gould

In Uncategorized on May 15, 2014 at 8:40 pm

“Funny how the SFWA became the public laughing stock that it has almost immediately after Gould took over. “

Steven Gould, SFWA President, used to be a good-looking (sexy) fella. Here’s a current and past photo.  It’s looking like the pressure of being SFWA President is catching up to Gould.

gould (2)

Could it be the kiss of death?

gould (3)

Lee Goldberg Issues . . . Top Posts at The Write Agenda (@leegoldberg)

In Uncategorized on May 14, 2014 at 12:50 am

More questions developing on Lee Goldberg’s (@leegoldberg) connections and ties to the local political scene in James Strauss’ neighborhood (Lake Geneva, Wisconsin); Goldberg’s motivations may very well go beyond “exposing a SCAM.” Stay tuned.

Lee Goldberg: What is His Motive and Hidden Agenda Behind Exposing James Strauss Now? @leegoldberg
Request for Information: Author & TV Producer, Lee Goldberg @leegoldberg
Who Drove Lee Goldberg to the Airport: Goldberg’s “Truth” Starts to Unravel
UPDATED: Lee Goldberg: What is His Motive and Hidden Agenda Behind Exposing James Strauss Now? @leegoldberg
Lee Goldberg Waffles on His Meals & Ride With Known Scammer James Strauss @Lee Goldberg
Libby Hellmann’s ‏(@libbyhellmann) Statement Now in Question Regarding Lee Goldberg (@leegoldberg)
Victoria Strauss
Request for Information: Lee Goldberg’s Speech During Love is Murder Conference at the Rosemont in Chicago
Literary Agent Links Lee Goldberg to Breakfast Table & as Passenger in James Strauss’ Vehicle – @leegoldberg
Nebula-nominated author John C. Wright, has publicly resigned from Science Fiction Writers of America (SFWA)
WRITER BEWARE
John Steinbeck Family Defrauded by Writer Beware™ & SFWA Attorney: The 2007 Scam that Writer Beware™ Didn’t Report . . . Why?
How Pathetic Can Preditors & Editors (P & E) David L. Kuzminski Be? . . . Revisited